Integration of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) in motorway/highway planning and construction: A case study for sustainable infrastructure development in Pakistan

Authors

  • Syeda Safina Ali Department of Environmental Sciences (DES), Faculty of Basic and Applied Sciences (FBAS), International Islamic University, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan
  • Ayesha Batool Department of Environmental Sciences (DES), Faculty of Basic and Applied Sciences (FBAS), International Islamic University, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53992/njns.v9i4.225

Keywords:

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), Motorway planning, Baseline Data, Alternative Assessment

Abstract

Pakistan has constantly prioritized the development of roads and motorways as they are they are reflective of nation’s economic and physical condition. However, poor highway planning, design, and construction can have a negative impact on the environment and can lower the quality of life for inhabitants. Therefore, eco-friendly roadway/motorway planning, and construction approaches are crucial for reducing environmental, social, and economic damages. Currently, environmental impact assessment (EIA) is the prevalent method for assessing and evaluating the environmental impact of road infrastructure projects. Still, this conventional approach focuses primarily on development projects and lacks strategic insight. Hence, the world is now focusing on integrating and implementing SEA as a realistic approach for executing a sustainability plan in every area, including the infrastructure and transportation sector. Pakistan invests a considerable portion of its annual budget on infrastructure, particularly roadways; therefore, it must incorporate the changing trends and parameters into the planning and developing phase. thus, current research aims to incorporate SEA into the strategic planning of motorway/highway development by conducting a desktop study using secondary sources, including research articles and EIA reports, to analyze the environmental and socioeconomic effects of motorway/highway by identifying the direct, indirect, and commutative impacts. The alternatives are assessed using impact criteria and indicators to choose the best sustainable option for achieving the required objectives. our study is a pioneer work to integrate SEA into the planning process for highway construction, which would act as a baseline and an advisory tool for the decision-makers to incorporate SEA in Pakistan’s strategic development planning.

References

S. H. Mustafa, S. Saeed, “Criteria identification for sustainable highways in Pakistan: Int. J. Curr. Res. 2017: vol. 9(11): 60361-60366.

Castañeda K, Sánchez O, Herrera RF, Mejía G. Highway planning trends: a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability. 2022 May 5;14(9):5544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095544

He Y. Study on strategic environmental assessment of highway construction based on entropy–AHP. In Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management: Theory and Apply of Industrial Management. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2013;407-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40072-8_40

Walia K, Aggarwal RK, Bhardwaj SK. Environment impact assessment of highway expansion–a review. Current World Environment. 2017 Dec 1;12(3):507-5819.

Jamshed A, Altaf S, Javed S, Ali A. Evaluating the Environmental Impact Assessment of Road Rehabilitation Projects: Comparative Study of Pakistan and Vietnam. Science, Technology and Development. 2018;37(3):122-130.

A. Enríquez-de-Salamanca. Project justification and EIA: Anything goes? Environmental Impact goes? Ent Review. 2021 Mar 1; 87:106540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106540

L. E. Sánchez, S. S. Silva-Sánchez, Tiering strategic environmental assessment and project environmental impact assessment in highway planning in São Paulo, Brazil: Environ. Impact

Assess. Rev.2008; 28(7):515–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.02.001

Fundingsland Tetlow M, Hanusch M. Strategic environmental assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 2012 Mar 1;30(1):15-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.666400

González A, Thérivel R, Fry J, Foley W. Advancing practice relating to SEA alternatives. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2015; 53:52-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.04.003

ECMT (2000), Strategic Environmental Assessment for Transport, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/ 10.1787/9789264188174-en.

Ehtasham L, Sherani SH, Younas K, Izbel U, Khan AH, Bahadur A, Akbar A. A review of the status of environmental impact assessment in Pakistan. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2022 Mar;18(2):314-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4499

Rodrigo-Ilarri J, González-González L, Rodrigo-Clavero ME, Cassiraga E. Advances in implementing strategic environmental assessment (SEA) techniques in central America and the Caribbean. Sustainability. 2020 May 14;12(10):4039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104039

Chaker A, El-Fadl K, Chamas L, Hatjian B. A review of strategic environmental assessment in 12 selected countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2006 Jan 1;26(1):15-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.010

Therivel R, Paridario MR. The practice of strategic environmental assessment. Routledge; 2013 Oct 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315070865

Ur Rehman Z. Environmental impact assessment of Faisalabad: Pindi Bhattian motorway (M-3). Institute of Chemical Engineering & Technology, University of The Punjab, Lahore 2007.

Global Village Space, “Pakistan’s smart motorways strength for regional connectivity,” 2021. Accessed: May 25, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.globalvillagespace.com/pakistans-smart-motorways-strength-for-regional-connectivity/

Donnelly A, Jones M, O'Mahony T, Byrne G. Selecting environmental indicator for use in strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2007 Mar 1;27(2):161-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.10.006

Dale VH, Efroymson RA, Kline KL, Langholtz MH, Leiby PN, Oladosu GA, Davis MR, Downing ME, Hilliard MR. Indicators for assessing socioeconomic sustainability of bioenergy systems: a short list of practical measures. Ecological Indicators. 2013 Mar 1; 26:87-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.10.014

UNECE, “Composite socio-economic indicators. in developing and using composite indicators in policy research: a seminar (chapter 6),” in United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/ge.42/2017/Seminar/Chapter_6_draft_2017.06.15_for_the_seminar.pdf

NHA, “Feasibility Study of New Four Lane Motorway Starting from Yarak on Indus Highway N–55 to Hakla on M–1,” MM Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd, National Highway Authority (NHA), 2017.

Kamboji N, Kumari ES. Environment Impact assessment for Highway: A Review. International Journal of Innovative research in science and Engineering, 2017; 12(9)507-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.12.3.04

NCB, “Strategic environmental assessment of the Isle of Wight LTP3: Environmental report,” 2010. UE-0076_IoW LTP3 ER_2_101110NCB, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-18

How to Cite

Safina Ali, S., & Batool, A. (2024). Integration of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) in motorway/highway planning and construction: A case study for sustainable infrastructure development in Pakistan. NUST Journal of Natural Sciences, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.53992/njns.v9i4.225